Power Sample Multiplier
Calculator

Inputs

Sample size multiplier
6.249999

Results

Sample size multiplier
6.249999
Required sample size
399.999999
Effect magnitude
0.4

Academic results

Sample size multiplier6.249999
Required sample size399.999999
Effect magnitude0.4

formula-map diagram

Sample size multiplier
6.249999
Required sample size
399.999999
Effect magnitude
0.4

Formula breakdown

Formula

n ∝ 1 ÷ d²

= 6.25

Note

This is a simplified model. Grading rules, credit systems and statistical assumptions vary by institution and study design; check your syllabus, registrar or methods guide before relying on these figures.

More in Academic and research

See all →

Frequently asked questions

What is statistical power, in plain terms?+

Power is the probability that a study correctly detects a real effect when one actually exists, commonly set at 80% or 90% as a target. Low power means a real effect could easily be missed, producing a false negative.

Why does higher desired power require more participants?+

To reliably detect smaller and smaller differences from random noise, you need more data to reduce the uncertainty around your estimate; power and sample size trade off directly, so increasing one target (power) increases the other requirement (sample size) for a fixed effect size.

How does expected effect size affect the required sample multiplier?+

Smaller expected effects require dramatically larger sample sizes to detect reliably, since the signal-to-noise ratio is lower; a study looking for a subtle effect needs a much bigger multiplier applied to its base sample size than one expecting a strong, obvious effect.

What happens if a study is underpowered?+

An underpowered study has a meaningfully high chance of failing to detect a real effect (a Type II error) even when one exists, and any significant results it does find tend to overestimate the true effect size, a phenomenon known as the winner's curse.

Is 80% power a strict scientific standard?+

It's a widely used convention rather than a strict law, chosen as a reasonable balance between resource cost and risk of missing a true effect. Some fields or high-stakes studies opt for 90% or higher when the cost of a false negative is severe.