Passer Rating
Calculator
Results
- Passer rating
- 107.864763
- Completion component (a)
- 1.968858
- Yards component (b)
- 1.280276
- Touchdown component (c)
- 1.280276
- Interception component (d)
- 1.942474
Sport statistics results
| Passer rating | 107.864763 |
| Completion component (a) | 1.968858 |
| Yards component (b) | 1.280276 |
| Touchdown component (c) | 1.280276 |
| Interception component (d) | 1.942474 |
formula-map diagram
- Passer rating
- 107.864763
- Completion component (a)
- 1.968858
- Yards component (b)
- 1.280276
- Touchdown component (c)
- 1.280276
- Interception component (d)
- 1.942474
Formula breakdown
Formula
Rating = ((a + b + c + d) ÷ 6) × 100, each component clamped to 0–2.375= 107.86476355248
Note
Simplified model: these are the standard published statistics computed from the numbers you enter. They ignore park factors, opponent strength, playing conditions and league adjustments, so results are indicative only and not an official rating.
More in Sport statistics
See all →Frequently asked questions
What does NFL passer rating measure?+
Passer rating combines completion percentage, yards per attempt, touchdown percentage, and interception percentage into a single number meant to summarize a quarterback's passing efficiency in a given game or season. It ranges from 0 to a maximum of 158.3.
Why does passer rating max out at 158.3 instead of 100?+
The formula caps each of its four components at a maximum value before combining them, and 158.3 is simply the mathematical ceiling that results when all four components hit their individual maximums simultaneously. It's an artifact of the formula's construction, not a round or intuitive number by design.
What is considered a good passer rating?+
A rating above 100 in a season is considered excellent, around 85-90 is roughly average for a starting NFL quarterback, and below 70 typically signals a difficult, inefficient season. A perfect single-game rating of 158.3 requires exceptional completion rate, yardage, touchdowns, and zero interceptions in that game.
Does passer rating account for sacks or rushing yards?+
No, sacks and rushing production are completely excluded from the formula, which only looks at pass attempts, completions, yards, touchdowns, and interceptions. This is one reason ESPN's alternative Total QBR metric was created, to incorporate factors like sacks and situational context that passer rating ignores.
Why is passer rating sometimes criticized by analysts?+
Critics point out that the four components are combined with an arbitrary weighting scheme that doesn't map cleanly to actual win probability or point contribution, and that it ignores context like game situation, opponent strength, and pressure faced. It remains widely used mainly because of its long history and easy availability, not because it's the most predictive metric available.